African Journal of Paediatric Surgery About APSON | PAPSA  
Home About us Editorial Board Current issue Search Archives Ahead Of Print Subscribe Instructions Submission Contact Login 
Users Online: 1058Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size 
 
 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 301-305
Transanal Swenson's operation for Recto-sigmoid Hirschsprung's disease


Department of Paediatrics Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh - 160 012, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication11-Jan-2012
 

   Abstract 

Background: Transanal Swenson's operation is a relatively new single-stage procedure for Hirschsprung's disease. The results of this procedure at our centre are presented. Patients and Methods: Seventeen patients of recto-sigmoid Hirschsprung's disease underwent single-stage transanal Swenson's procedure. The diagnosis was based on the evidence of a transition zone on barium enema examination. A full thickness incision was made on the rectal wall posteriorly, 0.5 cm above the dentate line. The mobilised segment was resected about 5 cm above the transition zone. Frozen sections were performed whenever the transition zone was not clearly seen intra-operatively. The operation was completed by full thickness colo-anal anastomosis. Results: There were fourteen male and three female patients. The ages of the patients ranged from two months to eight years (median 14 months). The median hospital stay was four days (range four to seven days). Two patients required additional abdominal mobilisation. The anatomical transition zone as seen intra-operatively correlated with the pathological transition zone in all the cases. Two patients had episodes of post-operative enterocolitis and the other two patients developed stricture of the anastomosis. The follow-up period ranged from six to 45 months (Mean 35.4 months). Post-operative soiling was observed in all the patients and lasted from two to six weeks (Mean 3.4 weeks). There were no injuries to the surrounding structures. No patient had voiding disturbances and post-void residual urine was normal in all the patients. Initial increased frequency of bowel movements had settled to one to three per day. Conclusions: Transanal Swenson's pull through not only avoids laparotomy, but also the problems associated with the muscular cuff of transanal endorectal pull-through. The anatomical transition zone can be safely utilised to decide the resection limits. By a meticulous technique of dissection, injury to the surrounding structures can also be avoided.

Keywords: Hirschsprung′s disease, recto-sigmoid, swenson, transanal

How to cite this article:
Mahajan J K, Rathod KK, Bawa M, Narasimhan K L. Transanal Swenson's operation for Recto-sigmoid Hirschsprung's disease. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2011;8:301-5

How to cite this URL:
Mahajan J K, Rathod KK, Bawa M, Narasimhan K L. Transanal Swenson's operation for Recto-sigmoid Hirschsprung's disease. Afr J Paediatr Surg [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Apr 9];8:301-5. Available from: http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/text.asp?2011/8/3/301/91678

   Introduction Top


The surgical management of the recto-sigmoid Hirschsprung's disease (HD) is rapidly changing from the three-staged procedure to a single-stage, transanal, pull-through procedure. This evolution aims at reducing the cost, hospital stay, and the morbidity associated with the staged procedures. [1] Transanal procedures leave no scars; have less post-operative pain, and a shorter hospital stay. The most commonly used technique for the transanal pull-through is endorectal dissection, which leaves a long muscular cuff, which is usually split posteriorly. [2] It is well known that the long muscular cuff that is left behind causes obstruction. A few studies in the literature have shown that the problem of the remnant rectal cuff can be avoided if the transanal resection of the aganglionic segment is performed in the manner described by Swenson; by dissecting the full thickness of the rectum. [3],[4] A preoperative rectal biopsy is often used to confirm the diagnosis, but in this study, the clinical, and radiological features were relied upon and their diagnostic efficacy was validated by the findings of the post-operative specimen histopathology. We present our results following transanal recto-sigmoidectomy and colo-anal anastomosis using the radiological signs and the intra-operative features on clinical inspection and palpation, with or without the use of frozen sections.


   Patients and Methods Top


From January 2003 to July 2009, 112 patients of HD were seen in the Unit of Paediatrics Surgery. Out of these, 17 children with recto-sigmoid HD were selected to undergo the transanal single-stage Swenson's procedure. All the patients presented with a history of delayed passage of the meconium and constipation, and the recto-sigmoid HD was diagnosed by a contrast enema [Figure 1]. Besides recto-sigmoid disease, a good general condition, ability to decompress the colon on pre-operative wash outs, and the absence of the preoperative enterocolitis were the other selection criteria. The patients who required preoperative rectal biopsy for the diagnosis were excluded from the study and the plan of the treatment. Preoperative preparation was done with rectal wash outs using normal saline and antibiotics, as for conventional colorectal surgery. Under general anaesthesia with caudal block, a per-urethral catheter was placed and the rectum was irrigated with dilute Betadine solution. In the lithotomy position, perianal retraction was achieved with an appropriate-sized ring retractor, held in place with the help of six to eight circumferential silk sutures [Figure 2]. At the beginning, a full thickness incision was made on the rectal wall posteriorly, 0.5 cm above the dentate line. The incision was extended all around the circumference, incising the full thickness of the rectal wall. Rectal mobilisation was done by working on the surface of the rectal wall similar to the mobilisation performed for the anorectal malformations using a bipolar cauterisation probe. [5] The dissection could be performed easily once peritoneal reflection was reached, allowing mobilisation of the rectum and sigmoid colon out of the anus without leaving behind any muscular cuff. The proximal dissection was continued till the transition zone was clearly visible. The aganglionic colonic segment was resected; at least 5 cm above the transition zone and a full thickness colo-anal anastomosis was completed . Intra-operative identification of the anatomical transition zone was possible in 10 cases (59%, 10/17) [Figure 3], which was subsequently confirmed by the specimen histopathology in all the ten cases (100%). The absence of ganglion cells, with the presence of hypertrophic nerve fibres were the histological features used for diagnosis. In the remaining seven patients, including two cases with a transition zone at the descending colon, the presence of ganglion cells was confirmed by the intra-operative frozen section.
Figure 1: Barium enema examination showing recto-sigmoid Hirschsprung's disease


Click here to view
Figure 2: Retractor in place just before start of dissection


Click here to view
Figure 3: Intra-operative delineation of anatomical transition zone


Click here to view



   Results Top


A total of seventeen children, fourteen males and three females, with age ranging from two months to eight years (Median 14 months) underwent transanal Swenson's procedure. The operating time, including the time taken for the frozen sections, ranged from 120 to 200 minutes (Mean 141.7 minutes). The length of the bowel resections ranged from 15 to 29 cm (mean 18.2 cm). Two patients required abdominal mobilisation of the colon, as the narrow segment extended to the descending colon as well. The estimated blood loss was 40 to 180 ml (average 58.5 ml). Post operatively, seven patients passed stool within 24 hours and the other 10 had bowel movements within three days of the operation. All the 17 children tolerated full oral feeds by the third post-operative day. The hospital stay ranged from four to seven days (median four days). There were no intra-operative or post-operative complications related to the pull-through procedure. None of the children had anastomotic dehiscence, wound infections, or bowel obstruction. Two patients had post-operative enterocolitis, which resolved with antibiotics and rectal wash outs. Two children developed anastomotic strictures. The strictures were evident by the sixth post-operative week and required three and four anal dilatations, respectively, in each patient at intervals of 15 days. The follow-up period ranged from six months to 45 months (Mean 35.4 months). Post-operative soiling of the diapers in between the acts of defecation was observed in all the patients, which lasted from two to six weeks (Mean 3.52 weeks). Most of the patients (14 / 17, 85%) had achieved normal bowel movements within three weeks. No voiding disturbances in the form of incontinence, poor stream, or retention were encountered in the follow-up period, and the ultrasound examination of the urinary bladder did not reveal any post-void residual urine. The initial increased frequency of the bowel movements had settled to one to three per day by the second week and none of the patients complained of recurrent constipation. None of the remaining 15 patients had required post-operative anal dilatations or dietary modifications. The requirement for post-operative pain relief was negligible and all the patients could be started on oral feeds the next day.


   Discussion Top


The first reconstructive operation for Hirschsprung's disease was described by Swenson and Bill in 1948. [2] Since then, various other trans-abdominal pull-through procedures like Soave, Duhamel, and Rehbein have been described. The first report on the transanal procedures for the classic recto-sigmoid HD was published in 1998. [6] The primary transanal pull-through techniques with various modifications have become the standard of care around the world, each having their own proponents. [7] The advantages of one-stage transanal procedures are numerous, ranging from the avoidance of multiple laparotomies and the preliminary colostomy with their associated complications, reduced operating time, less blood loss, no pelvic structure damage, single hospital admission, short hospital stay, decreased need for analgesics, significantly lower hospital costs, and no external scars, and with improved cosmetic appearance, [8],[9],[10],[11] without compromising on the functional outcomes [12] Above all, there is a high degree of parental acceptance of the procedure, as it avoids the need to care for a baby with a colostomy. However, the aganglionic rectal muscular sleeve in the transanal Soave's procedure limits the volume of the replaced sigmoid and the rectum. [13] This remnant rectal cuff also causes cuff strictures, diarrhoea, and incontinence. [14],[15],[16] Many authors have recommended that this cuff be divided down to the sphincter to avoid constriction of the pulled through bowel, but this has remained controversial. [17] Falchetti et al reported that the cuff can roll down during the transanal pull-through and form a constricting ring just above the anastomosis. [18] To avoid this problem, a few authors have used a much shorter mucosectomy with a shorter muscle cuff measuring only 1-2 cm -above the dentate line. [7],[18] Gao et al. described primary transanal recto-sigmoidectomy with the potential advantages of a partial rectal mucosectomy, shorter muscular cuff, internal anal sphincterotomy, and oblique anastomosis. [19] A few authors have entirely eliminated the sub-mucous dissection and described a transanal Swenson procedure without any residual muscular cuff. [3],[4]

We have performed a primary transanal Swenson's procedure in selected cases where the preoperative contrast enema showed a distinct transition zone, with dilatation of the proximal normal bowel. Intra-operatively, we started our full thickness rectal dissection 0.5 cm above the dentate line, so as to remove the whole aganglionic bowel segment, because the aganglionic segment may lengthen over a period of time with the growth of the child, and get predisposed to post-operative constipation problems. [3] We commenced our dissection posteriorly, as no important pelvic structures were encountered in that location. In cases, where the macroscopic transition zone was visible, we removed an extra 5 cm segment of the dilated colon to ensure pulling through of the ganglionated segment of the colon. In doubtful cases, where there was no visible differentiation of the transition zone, a frozen section confirmation was sought. With the limited availability of the resources, this seemed to be the logical course of action, and a preoperative biopsy might not be required in all the cases of HD. The combination of the clinical history and the contrast enema findings was 100% accurate for the diagnosis. Preoperative rectal biopsy also makes the subsequent transanal dissection difficult due to scarring and fibrosis, which may affect the functional outcome. [1] Our data shows that a distinct transition zone, if seen on contrast enema, is sufficient for the diagnosis of HD and further investigations may not be necessary. Thus, a contrast enema may not be a sensitive investigation, but is very specific for diagnosing HD. The location of the transition zone, as seen on contrast enema, has correlated accurately with the anatomical changes in the bowel in 59% of our patients. The loss of the anatomical transition zone in some of the patients can be due to the use preoperative rectal wash outs. Procter et al. had shown that the radiographic transition zone correlates accurately with the level of aganglionosis in 90% cases of recto-sigmoid HD. [20] In 10 out of 17 (59%) patients in whom there was a classical anatomical transition zone, we could successfully avoid the frozen section biopsy, thus reducing the operating time. This becomes very important at the centres where the facility for frozen section is either unavailable or not well standardised. Sookpotarom et al. performed the transanal Swenson's procedure in 27 patients, based only on the radiological findings and intra-operative assessment of the anatomical changes, without the use of the frozen section technique. Their assessment showed an accurate correlation with the final histopathological level of the aganglionosis in 85% of the patients. [21] In the present study we showed that when present, the anatomic changes correlate with the pathological level of aganglionosis in 100% of the cases. There was no need to taper the dilated bowel. We did not do an oblique anastomosis, [22] but still did not encounter any obstructive problems. With strict dissection on the rectal wall, injury to the urogenital tract and the pelvic nerves could also be avoided. A comparison of the various studies, in literature, for transanal Swenson's procedure is shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Comparison of various series of Transanal Swenson's procedure


Click here to view


In conclusion, our initial results are quite promising. Transanal Swenson procedure is a feasible and safe undertaking in the properly selected cases of HD. It not only avoids multiple abdominal operations, but also the problems associated with the long muscular cuff of the transanal Soave's procedure. By adhering to the principle of dissecting on the rectal wall, injury to the surrounding structures and voiding disturbances of the bladder can also be avoided. This approach can be used safely in the patients of recto-sigmoid aganglionosis, which comprises of about 70 - 80% of the cases of Hirschsprung's disease.

 
   References Top

1.Pratap A, Shakya VC, Biswas BK, Sinha A, Tiwari A, Agrawal CS, et al. Single-stage endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease perspective from developing country. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:532-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Rintala RJ. Transanal coloanal pullthrough with a short muscular cuff for classic Hirschsprung's disease. EurJ Pediatr Surg 2003;13:181-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Weidner BC, Waldhausen JH. Swenson revisited: A one stage transanal pullthrough procedure for Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1208-11.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.Peterlim FL, Martins JL. Modified Transanal recto-sigmoidectomy for Hirschsprung's disease: Clinical and manometric results in the initial 20 cases. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1048-50.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Levitt MA, Peña A. Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007;2:33.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.De la Torre Mondragon L, Ortega-Salgado JA. Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1283-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Ahmed N, Langer JC. Evolution of technique in the transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: Effect on outcome. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:36-40.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Rintala RJ. Transanal coloanal pull-through with a short muscular cuff for classic Hirschsprung's disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2003;13:181-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Jona JZ, Cohen RD, Georgeson KE, Rothenberg SS. Laparoscopic procedures for Hirschsprung's disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 1998;7:228-31.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Garrard CL, Clements RH, Nanney L, Davidson JM, Richards WO. Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoseopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1999;13:10-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
11.Langer JC, Seifert M, Minkes RK. One stage Soave pull through for Hirschsprung's disease A comparison of transanal versus open approaches. J Pediatr Surg 2000;35:820-2.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
12.Van Leeuwen K, Geiger JD, Barnett JL, Coran AG, Teitelbaum DH. Stooling and manometric findings after primary pull through in Hirschsprung's disease: Perineal versus-abdominal approaches. Pediatr Surg Inter 2002;37:1321-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Holschneider AM, Borner W, Burman O, Caffarena PF, Issendorf HV, Kaiser G, et al. Clinical and electro-manometrical investigations of the post-operative continence in Hirschsprung's disease. An international workshop. Z. Kinderchir 1980;29:39-48.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Tariq GM, Brereton RJ, Wright VM. Complications of endorectal pull through for Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg l991;26:1202-6.   Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Fourtuna RS, Weber TR, Tracy TF, Silen ML, Cradock TV. Critical Analysis of the operative treatment of Hirschsprung's disease. Arch Surg 1996;131:520-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Joseph VT, Sim CK. Problems and pitfalls in the management of Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg l988;23:398-402.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Falchetti D, Desant A, Villancci V, Iannuccelli M. Laparoscopic relief of obstructing folded muscular cuff after transanal pull-through for aganglionosis. Surg Endosc 2004;18:717-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Wester T, Rintala RJ. Early outcome of transanal endorectal pull-through with a short muscle cuff during the neonatal period. J Pediatr Surg 2004;39:157-60.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
19.Gao Ya, Li Gongcai, Zhang X, Xu Q, Guo Z, Zheng B, et al. Primary transanal recto-sigmoidectomy for Hirschsprung's disease: Preliminary results in the initial 33 cases. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:1816-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Proctor ML, Traubici J, Langer JC, Gibbs DL, Ein SH, Daneman A, et al. Correlation between radiographic transition zone and level of aganglionosis in Hirschsprung's disease: Implications for surgical approach. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:775-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
21.Sookpotarom P, Vejchapipat P. Primary transanal Swenson pull-through operation for Hirschsprung's disease. Pediatr Surg Int 2009;25:767-73.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
22.Xu ZL, Zhao Z, Wang L, An Q, Tao WF. A new modification of transanal Swenson pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung's disease. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008;121:2420-3.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  

Top
Correspondence Address:
J K Mahajan
Department of Paediatrics Surgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0189-6725.91678

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Transanal pullthrough for Hirschsprung disease: matched case–control comparison of Soave and Swenson techniques
Ahmed Nasr,Ramanath N. Haricharan,Julie Gamarnik,Jacob C. Langer
Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 A variant pattern of Calretinin immunohistochemistry on rectal suction-biopsies is fully specific of short-segment Hirschsprung’s disease
Vincent Guinard-Samuel,Arnaud Bonnard,Michel Peuchmaur,Dominique Berrebi
Pediatric Surgery International. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Hirschsprung disease in adulthood: An alternative surgical approach using a U-shaped circular anastomosis
G. Chatzoulis,S. Milias,N. Kostogloudis,C. Christopoulos,Kostas Chatzoulis,V. Pantelidou,K. Mourelatos,A. Ploumis
Hellenic Journal of Surgery. 2013; 85(6): 390
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Patients and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed8534    
    Printed168    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded239    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal