African Journal of Paediatric Surgery About APSON | PAPSA  
Home About us Editorial Board Current issue Search Archives Ahead Of Print Subscribe Instructions Submission Contact Login 
Users Online: 273Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size 
 
 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 122-125
Single-port laparoscopic surgery in children: A new alternative in developing countries


Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hedi Chaker Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication9-Jul-2015
 

   Abstract 

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a technique in laparoscopic surgery, which is based on the idea that all the laparoscopic trocars are inserted through a single umbilical incision. This paper documents a single-centre experience, which performed the single-port surgery in children using an improvised trans-umbilical glove-port with conventional rigid instruments. Materials and Methods: We prospectively studied the outcomes of SILS procedures between January 2013 and June 2014. Materials required making our homemade trans-umbilical port consisted on: A flexible ring, a rigid larger ring, one powder-free surgical glove, a wire-to-skin and standard standards laparoscopic trocars. Results: A total of 90 consecutive procedures had been done in our institution: 15 girls and 75 boys (mean age: 7.5 years). We used SILS on 59 appendectomies with an average operative time of 48 minutes. We needed conversion to conventional surgery in three cases (two with perforated appendicitis and one for difficulty to mobilize the appendix). SIL cholecystectomy was performed for four patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis; mean operative time was 60 min. All patients were discharged on postoperative day 2. Eighteen boys with non-palpable testis were explored and treated. Other procedures included: Varicocelectomy (n = 2), intra-abdominal lymph node biopsies (n = 2), ovarian cystectomy (n = 1), ovarian transposition (n = 1), aspiration of renal hydatid cyst (n = 1), explorative laparoscopy in research to Meckel's diverticulum (n = 1) and intestinal intussusceptions (n = 1). No post-operative complications were seen in all cases. Conclusions: SILS in the paediatric population using conventional rigid instruments is feasible, safe and effective. It may be an alternative to the costly commercially available single-port systems especially in a developing country like Tunisia.

Keywords: Single-incision laparoscopy, children, rigid instruments

How to cite this article:
Mahdi BD, Rahma C, Mohamed J, Riadh M. Single-port laparoscopic surgery in children: A new alternative in developing countries. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2015;12:122-5

How to cite this URL:
Mahdi BD, Rahma C, Mohamed J, Riadh M. Single-port laparoscopic surgery in children: A new alternative in developing countries. Afr J Paediatr Surg [serial online] 2015 [cited 2018 Jan 21];12:122-5. Available from: http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/text.asp?2015/12/2/122/160354

   Introduction Top


Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a technique in laparoscopic surgery, which is based on the idea that all the laparoscopic trocars are inserted through a single umbilical incision. [1] However, this technique requires specialised instruments, which are very costly and not affordable by the majority of the population in a developing country like Tunisia.

We present in this paper our single-centre experience that performed the single-port surgery in children using an improvised trans-umbilical glove-port with conventional rigid instruments.


   Patients and Operative Technique Top


To make the trans-umbilical glove port, we require a flexible ring (FR), a rigid larger ring (RR), one powder-free surgical glove, a wire-to-skin and standard laparoscopic trocars [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Materials required for construction of transumbilical glove-port

Click here to view


These two rings are made of a silicone product that had Food and Drug Administration certification. They are issued after testes made in USA and are guaranteed for life.

At the beginning of the procedure, the fingertips of the glove are cut-off where the trocars are inserted and fixed by a vicryl 3/0 ligature wire. Then, the open end of the glove is passed through the FR and turned around it in the middle of the glove [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. Afterwards, a 2 cm skin incision at the level of the umbilicus and peritoneum opening are generally sufficient to introduce the FR covered by the glove into the abdominal cavity [Figure 4]. The open end of the glove surrounds then closely the RR. Pneumoperitoneum could be created by carbon dioxide insufflations through one of the trocars. Conventional laparoscopic instruments and a 0° laparoscope are also introduced into the abdominal cavity through these trocars [Figure 5]. At the end of the operation, the specimen is pulled out. We close then the muscle fascia by vicryl 2/0 sutures and the umbilical skin using the rapid vicryl sutures [Figure 6].
Figure 2: Open end of the glove passed through the flexible ring

Click here to view
Figure 3: Glove port ready for insertion

Click here to view
Figure 4: Flexible ring introduced through the umbilical incision

Click here to view
Figure 5: Open end of the glove being wrapped around the towel ring and pneumoperitoneum creation

Click here to view
Figure 6: Postoperative photography showing umbilical incision after a single-port appendectomy

Click here to view


All cases were performed in Hedi Chaker University School of Medicine, Department of Paediatric surgery, between January 2013 and June 2014. All patients were evaluated prospectively, and data concerning the following were collected: Operative time, postoperative hospital stay, operative and postoperative complications. Operative time is considerate to be the time between the skin incision and closure.


   Results Top


A total of 90 consecutive procedures had been done in our institution: 15 girls and 75 boys. The mean age of the patients was 7.5 years (ranged from 6 months to 13 years).

We used SILS on 59 appendectomies. Average operative time was 48 min. We needed conversion to conventional surgery in three cases (two with perforated appendicitis and one for difficulty to mobilise the appendix).

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed for 4 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Neither conventional conversion nor additional ports have been needed in all cases. Mean operative time was 60 min. All patients were discharged on postoperative day 2.

We explored in this work 18 boys with non-palpable testis. In eight cases, the spermatic vessels and the vas deferens were engaged in the inguinal ring, and the testis was just atrophied. We performed Fowler Stephens technique in four cases and one-stage orchidopexy for six patients with intra-abdominal testis. Mean operative-time was 35.9 min.

Single-incision laparoscopic varicocelectomy was made for 2 boys. They had respectively 8- and 10-year-old. Mean operative time was 30 min.

We performed 2 intra-abdominal lymph node biopsies that loaded to tuberculosis in one case and lymphoma in the other case.

Ovarian cystectomy was achieved for one girl in 70 min. Right ovarian transposition was accomplished to another 12-year-old girl with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma requiring a pelvic radiotherapy. The operation lasted 60 min.

We also treated one 5 cm renal hydatid cyst by SIL aspiration, without incidents. There was no recurrence during 1 year of postoperative follow-up.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery permitted the exploration of the abdominal cavity in research of Meckel's diverticulum in a 2-year-old infant with recurrent rectal bleeding. All the small intestine was checked in 20 min.

Finally, the younger patient who underwent SILS in our series was a 6-month-old infant with intestinal intussusception. Conversion to conventional surgery was needed for intestinal perforation.

No postoperative complications were seen in all cases.

[Table 1] demonstrates the procedure outcomes [Table 1].
Table 1: Outcomes of single port laparoscopic surgery using surgical glove port

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has been widely performed for most paediatric surgical procedures. [1] Then, many paediatric experiences have been reported highlighting the feasibility and the safety of this mini-invasive laparoscopic surgery in children. [2] They included abdominal operations such as appendectomies, [3],[4],[5] cholecystectomies, [6],[7],[8] splenectomies [9] and intestinal surgery. [10] Urologic procedures have also been reported: Pyeloplasty, [11] nephrectomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction or multicystic dysplastic kidney [12] and varicocelectomy. [13]

The commercially multichannel single-port devices are very costly, and ALEXIS ® wound retractor is not available; two arguments that limited the use of classic SILS in developing countries like ours. The homemade single-port system that we use in our department costs only around 30 Euros, which is approximately the 1/10 of the classic single laparoscopic surgery port expenditure. Port implantation is relatively easy and safe, and it provides increased mobility of hand tools.

However, it needs a significant coordination between the surgeon and the camera holder. The instruments are usually crossed at the access port into the abdominal cavity.

Decreased postoperative pain, as theoretical benefit of SILS, requires further investigation. Recently Zani et al. reported that SILS seems to be associated with more postoperative pain than standard laparoscopy. [14] However, a meta-analysis described by Saldaña and Targarona showed similar pain scores in both techniques. [15]

In this study, postoperative pain score were not analysed because this score did not correlate with requirement of additional analgesics. All patients were very satisfied with the cosmetic result.

To our knowledge, this technique has been previously used by only two authors in adults. Khiangte et al. performed a series of 40 single port surgeries including cholecystectomies, appendectomies, and ovarian cystectomies. [16] Uday and Bhargav used the same technique in appendectomies. [17]

According to our initial experience, SILS in the paediatric population with conventional rigid instruments is feasible, safe and effective. It may be an alternative to the costly commercially available single-port systems especially in a developing country like Tunisia.

 
   References Top

1.
Pfluke JM, Parker M, Stauffer JA, Paetau AA, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single incision: A systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg 2011;212:113-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Carissa LG, Carrie AL, Daniel JO, Charles LS, Walter SA, Holcomb GW 3 rd , et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery in children: Initial single-center experience. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:904-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Chandler NM, Danielson PD. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs multiport laparoscopic appendectomy in children: A retrospective comparison. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:2186-90.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kang DB, Lee SH, Lee SY, Oh JT, Park DE, Lee C, et al. Application of single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendectomy in children. J Korean Surg Soc 2012;82:110-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Lee SE, Choi YS, Kim BG, Cha SJ, Park JM, Chang IT. Single port laparoscopic appendectomy in children using glove port and conventional rigid instruments. Ann Surg Treat Res 2014;86:35-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Emami C, Deiadra G, Dean A, Manuel T, Nam XN. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children: A feasible alternative to the standard laparoscopic approach. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:1909-12.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Chandler NM, Danielson PD. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children: A retrospective comparison with traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:1695-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ostlie DJ, Adibe O, Juang D, Susan WS, Charles L, Walter SA, et al. Single incision versus standard 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg 2013;48:209-14.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Tranchart H, Lainas P, Tzanis D, Ferretti S, Pourcher G, Devaquet N, et al. Single incision laparoscopic splenectomy with hilar dissection for massive splenomegaly (with video). J Visc Surg 2014;151:153-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Clark JM, Koontz CS, Smith LA, Kelley JE. Video-assisted transumbilical Meckel's diverticulectomy in children. Am Surg 2008;74:327-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Woo JR, Marietti S, Masterson J, Chiang G. Minimal incision laparoscopy assisted open pediatric pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Urol 2014;10:391-3.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Cabezalí Barbancho D, Gómez Fraile A, López Vázquez F, Aransay Bramtot A. Single-port nephrectomy in infants: Initial experience. J Pediatr Urol 2011;7:396-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kaouk JH, Palmer JS. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: Initial experience in children for varicocelectomy. BJU Int 2008;102:97-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Zani A, Ade-Ajayi N, Cancelliere LA, Kemal KI, Patel S, Desai AP. Is Single Incision Paediatric Endoscopic Surgery more painful than standard laparoscopy in children? Personal experience and review of the literature. Minerva Pediatr 2014.; Epub ahead of print.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Saldaña LJ, Targarona EM. Single-incision pediatric endosurgery: A systematic review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013;23:467-80.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Khiangte E, Newme I, Phukan P, Medhi S. Improvised transumbilical glove port: A cost effective method for single port laparoscopic surgery. Indian J Surg 2011;73:142-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Uday SK, Bhargav PR. SILACIG: A novel technique of single-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy based on institutional experience of 29 cases. J Minim Access Surg 2013;9:76-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Chtourou Rahma
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hedi Chaker Hospital, Road El Ain Km 0.5, Sfax 3000
Tunisia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0189-6725.160354

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Single port laparoscopic orchidopexy in children using surgical glove port and conventional rigid instruments
Ben Dhaou Mahdi,Chtourou Rahma,Jallouli Mohamed,Zitouni Hayet,Mhiri Riadh
Korean Journal of Urology. 2015; 56(11): 781
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Patients and Ope...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2345    
    Printed48    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded170    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal