African Journal of Paediatric Surgery About APSON | PAPSA  
Home About us Editorial Board Current issue Search Archives Ahead Of Print Subscribe Instructions Submission Contact Login 
Users Online: 4124Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size 
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 145-149

Utilization of banked blood in pediatric surgical procedures in Calabar, Nigeria

1 Department of Surgery, Pediatric Surgery Unit, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
2 Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria
3 Department of Haematology, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
Usang E Usang
Department of Surgery, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, General Post Office (GPO) Box 195, Calabar Road, Calabar, Cross River State
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: There are no existing fi nancial interests or other relationships that might lead to a confl ict of interest., Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0189-6725.115041

Rights and Permissions

Background: Performing major surgery in a child demands that blood is cross-matched and saved to be transfused as indicated. Because the cost of cross-matching and donation of blood can be enormous and may equal or surpass the cost of surgery in our setting, it is pertinent to evaluate its utilization. The aim of this study was to determine how banked blood meant for pediatric surgical procedures was utilized with the hope of streamlining our blood requisition policy. This may be useful to pediatric and other surgeons involved in the operative care of children in similar settings. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study of all children who had ELECTIVE or EMERGENCY surgical procedures between January 2009 and June 2010. The age, sex, nature of surgery, blood loss, banked units of blood and amount transfused were collected and analyzed. Results: Eighty two patients had 81 units of blood banked for them. Forty - eight and half units (59.9%) of the banked blood were for the emergency group but only 18 units (22.2%) were actually transfused at the end (P = 0.044) leading to inadequate use of the product. Conclusion: Banking large quantities of blood but utilizing only little is tantamount to inadequate use and delays surgical intervention. Indirectly, it increases cost of surgery. There is need to rationalize our blood ordering habits without causing harm to patients.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded189    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal