African Journal of Paediatric Surgery About APSON | PAPSA  
Home About us Editorial Board Current issue Search Archives Ahead Of Print Subscribe Instructions Submission Contact Login 
Users Online: 974Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size 
 
 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 41-44
Hypospadias repair and outcome in Abuja, Nigeria: A 5-year single-centre experience


1 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, Abuja; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Gwagwalada, Nigeria
2 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Gwagwalada, Nigeria

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication6-Feb-2015
 

   Abstract 

Background: To determine the outcome of hypospadias repair in children. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients with hypospadias managed at the University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria from January 2009 to December 2013. Results: Twenty-four cases of hypospadias had corrective surgery during the 5-year period under review. Seventy-five percent of the patients (n = 18) were seen after the 1 st year of life. There were two peaks of ages at corrective repair; 45.8% between age 1 and 3 years and 29.1% between age 5 and 10 years. The average age at time of surgery was 44.9 months. Distal hypospadias were more common (58.4%), followed by glanular (20.8%) and proximal (20.8%) hypospadias. Associated anomalies included chordee, maldescended testicles and inguinal hernia in 20.8%, 4.1% and 8.3% cases, respectively. Operative techniques were single-stage procedures in 79.1% of patients consisting of simple circumcision in two cases (10.5%), Mathieu's peri-meatal based flap in four cases (21%), meatal advancement and glanuloplasty incorporated in three cases (16%) and Snodgrass tubularised incised urethral plate tubularised incised plate in 10 cases (52.5%). The remaining 20.9% (n = 5) had multi-staged procedures. The most common post-operative complications were urethrocutenous fistula in nine patients (33.3%) and metal stenosis in 3 patients (12.5%). Conclusions: Our results show that hypospadia repair is froth with attendant high complications in our setting.

Keywords: Hypospadias, outcome, repair

How to cite this article:
Aisuodionoe-Shadrach OI, Atim T, Eniola BS, Ohemu AA. Hypospadias repair and outcome in Abuja, Nigeria: A 5-year single-centre experience. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2015;12:41-4

How to cite this URL:
Aisuodionoe-Shadrach OI, Atim T, Eniola BS, Ohemu AA. Hypospadias repair and outcome in Abuja, Nigeria: A 5-year single-centre experience. Afr J Paediatr Surg [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Oct 24];12:41-4. Available from: https://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/text.asp?2015/12/1/41/150977

   Introduction Top


Hypospadias is the abnormal location of the urethra on the ventral surface of the penis, variably associated with the aborted development of the urethral spongiosum, ventral prepuce (with dorsal hooding), and ventral penile chordee. [1] Incidence is currently reported as 1 in 300 live male births [2] with an increasing incidence in western countries. [3] Not much studies have been published on this pathology in Nigeria, although Okeke et al. reported an incidence of 1.1% among primary school children in eastern Nigeria. [4] Hypospadias is classified as anterior (glanular and sub coronal), mid-penile (distal penile, midshaft, and proximal penile), and posterior (penoscrotal, scrotal, and perineal) accounting for 50%, 30%, and 20%, respectively. [5]

Hypospadias may be associated with other urogenital tract anomalies such as pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction, vesicoureteric reflux and renal agenesis. [5],[6],[7] Proximal hypospadias associated with cryptorchidism enlarged utricle, or micro-penis (penile size <2.5 cm) could be confused with intersex disorders. [8]

Since Celsius and Galen's first description of urethral hypoplasia and hypospadias malformation, [9] numerous techniques of repair have evolved in response to the challenge of creating a functional neo-urethra and aesthestic meatus. [10] The most favourable age for hypospadias repair is reported as 6-18 months. [11],[12] The present study reports our experience with the pattern of presentation, techniques and outcomes of repair of hypospadias in children.


   Patients and Methods Top


This was a retrospective study of all patients with hypospadias repair at the University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria from January 2009 to December 2013. All medical records of male patients managed for hypospadias reviewed. Data were analysed for demographic and clinical presentation, surgical treatment, complications, and their management using Microsoft Excel for Windows 2013 and the qualitative variables were presented as frequencies and simple percentages.


   Results Top


A total of 24 patients were included in this study with age ranging from 1 month to 10 years and an average age of 32.2 months at presentation. Seventy-five percent of the patients (n = 18) presented for the first time after the 1 st year of life. Two peaks of ages at corrective surgery were observed; 45.8% and 29.1% were operated in the 1-3 years and the 5-10 year age window respectively. The average age at time of surgery was 44.9 months.

Distal hypospadias (consisting of sub coronal, distal penile and mid-shaft) was the most common type in our study population accounting for 58.4% (n = 14) patients, followed by glanular hypospadias and proximal hypospadias (proximal penile, peno-scrotal and perineal), which had five cases (20.8%) each [Table 1].
Table 1: Characteristics of the repair and outcome of 17 patients with hypospadia

Click here to view


Of the total study population, 33.3% (n = 8) had associated anomalies. The most common type of anomaly was chordee in 20.8% (n = 5) patients. The chordee was present in all the five cases of proximal (100%) penile, penoscrotal and perineal hypospadias managed. A total of 8.3% (n = 2) of the patients had associated inguinal hernias, while maldescended testis was observed in just 4.1% (n = 1) case.

Of the total 24 cases of hypospadia, 79.1% (n = 19) were repaired in a single-stage procedure while 20.9% (n = 5) had staged repair. Of the 19 patients managed by a single-stage procedure, Snodgrass tubularised incised plate (TIP) was the predominant procedure performed in 10 (52.5%) cases. The remaining nine patients had meatal advancement and glanuloplasty incorporated, Mathieu's peri-meatal based flap and simple excision of the hooded-prepuce (circumcision) in 16% (n = 3), 21% (n = 4) and 10.5% (n = 2) respectively.

Two-stage hypospadias repair was the predominant surgical procedure for all types of proximal hypospadias managed. In the first stage of the repair, all five patients had correction of chordee, followed by Byar's flaps in three patients and buccal mucosa graft in two patients respectively. At the second stage operation, the well-incorporated graft and flap were tubularised to form the neo-urethra.

All corrective repair procedures were performed by specialist urologic surgeons without the aid of intra-operative magnification. In 91.7% (n = 22) of cases, in-dwelling stents were employed in the repairs with an average stent period of 10.2 days.

The overall complication rate observed in this review was significant at 50% with urethrocutenous fistula (UCF) being the most common complication in 37.5% (n = 9) and was highest for proximal hypospadias. The second most common complication was meatal stenosis observed in 12.5% (n = 3).

While 33.3% (n = 3) of the UCF closed spontaneously during a 1-3 month post-operative period of observation, 55.5% (n = 5) and 11.1% (n = 1) had to repaired by subsequent single surgical procedure and multiple surgical procedures, respectively thus leaving the corrected post-operative complication incidence of UCF at 25%.

The rates of complications for both single-stage and two-staged hypospadias repair were 58.3% (n = 7) and 41.7% (n = 5), respectively.


   Discussion Top


The mean age at presentation in this study is comparable to the report in other local studies. [12],[13] Glanular and sub-coronal hypospadias have been reported at about 50% of all hypospadias, [14],[15] similar to the finding in this study, but at variance with others. [12]

Our patients presented late as in earlier reports, [12],[13],[16] compared with those in the developed countries. [17] Early presentation and intervention before 18 months of age may prevent significant psychological morbidity which may be associated with genital surgery and gender identity confusion. In our setting, however, late intervention may still be preferred because of problems associated with a paediatric anaesthesia.

Until date, there is no goal standard for the repair of hypospadias urethroplasty, The repair technique would depend on the location and severity of the urethral defect, state of the urethral plate, degree of chordee, presence or not of other defects, intact foreskin, availability of equipment's (magnification and microsurgical instruments) and skill of the surgeon. Whichever technique is utilized, the goal is to achieve a functionally normal urethra and a cosmetically acceptable penis with good urinary and sexual function. [18] Of the three basic categories (tubularisation of the urethral plate, supplementation or substitution of the urethral plate with skin flaps, and urethral plate substitution with grafts) the most common form of primary repair is the urethral plate tubularisation. [14],[19],[20]

Two patients in our series (10.5%) with glanular hypospadias required no repairs since the condition will unlikely affect future fertility. All they needed was a simple circumcision, excising the hooded prepuce.

The most common operation to repair distal hypospadias in our series was the Snodgrass TIP procedure, which accounted for 52.5% (n = 10) of the cases in those that had a single-stage operation.

The choice of this procedure over others in these cases was the surgeon's preference, which could be related to skill and experience. All proximal hypospadias in our series (20.9%, n = 5) had a two-staged procedure. The choice of staging the repairs in these instances was again the surgeon's preference, which is related to skill and experience.

The reported incidence of complications following hypospadias repair ranges from 6% to 30%, with UCF ranking highest. [12],[13],[14],[21] This also was our experience with the UCF constituting almost 38% out of the 50% complication rates. Most of the UCF usually closed spontaneously during a 1-3 month post-operative period. Thus, we suggest at least 1-3 month postoperative period of masterly inactivity before embarking on UCF repair.


   Conclusion Top


The most common type of hypospadias in our current review was the distal penile type. The most common complications were UCFs and meatal stenosis. The prevalence of postoperative complications may be minimized by observing best-practice guidelines such as operating within the prescribed age-window and the use of intraoperative magnification and microsurgical instruments which we lacked.

 
   References Top

1.
Iqbal T, Nasir U, Khan M. Frequency of complication in the Snodgrass repair and its risk factors. Pak J Surg 2011;3:188-193.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Klufio GO, Yeboah ED. Bladder, urethra and penis In: Badoe EA, Archampong EQ, da Rocha-Afodu JT, editors. Principles and Practice of Surgery Including Pathology in the Tropics. 4 th ed. Tema, Ghana: Ghana Publishing Corporation; 2009. p. 890.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mouriquand PD, Persad R, Sharma S. Hypospadias repair: Current principles and procedures. Br J Urol 1995;76 Suppl 3:9-22.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Okeke A, Okonkwo C, Osegbe D. Frequency of hypospadias, abdominal and penoscrotal abnormalities among primary school boys in a Nigerian community. Afr J Urol 2003:9;56-64.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bhat A. General considerations in hypospadias surgery. Indian J Urol 2008;24:188-94.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
6.
Hayashi Y, Kojima Y. Current concepts in hypospadias surgery. Int J Urol 2008;15:651-64.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Manski D. Hypospadias: Causes, Diagnosis and Treatment; 2012. Available from: http://www.urology-textbook.com/hypospadias.html. last accessed on August 6,2014.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kuschel C, Hamill J. Hypospadias; 2005. Available from: http://www.adhb.govt.nz/newborn/Guidelines/Anomalies/Hypospadias.htm. last accessed on August 6, 2014.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Smith ED. The history of hypospadias. Pediatr Surg Int 1977;21:81-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Chertin B, Prat D, Shenfeld OZ. Outcome of pediatric hypospadias repair in adulthood. Open Access J Urol 2010 29;2:57-62.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Mansoor K, Abdul M, Waqas H, Hidayat U, Shazia N, Syed AS, et al. Hypospadias repair: A single centre experience. Plast Surg Int 2014.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Olajide AO, Sowande AO, Salako AA, Olajide FO, Adejuyigbe O. Challenges of surgical repair of hypospadias in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Afr J Urol 2009:15;96-102.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Abdur-Rahman LO, Nasiru AA, Adeyeye AA, Adeniran JO. Outcomes of management of hypospadias at a teaching hospital in Nigeria. Trop J Health Sci 2011;18:64486.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Snodgrass WT. Hypospadias. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10 th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.; 2012. p. 3503-36.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hypospadias. Available from: http://www.emedicine.medscape.com/article/1015227. [Last accessed on 2014 Jul 11].  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Sowande AO, Olajide AO, Salako AA, Olajide FO, Adejuyigbe O, Talabi AO. Experience with transverse preputial island flap for repair of hypospadias in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2009;6:40-3.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
17.
Bermudez DM, Canning DA, Liechty KW. Age and pro-inflammatory cytokine production: Wound-healing implications for scar-formation and the timing of genital surgery in boys. J Pediatr Urol 2011;7:324-31.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Imamoglu MA, Kiper A, Tuygun C, Gücük A. Results of TIPU on patients with primary and recurrent hypospadias. J Ankara Med Sch 2003;25:179-84.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Nerli RB, Guntaka AK, Patil RA, Patne PB. Dorsal inlay inner preputial graft for primary hypospadias repair. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2014;11:105-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
20.
Arnaud A, Harper L, Aulagne MB, Michel JL, Maurel A, Dobremez E, et al. Choosing a technique for severe hypospadias. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2011;8:286-90.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
21.
Beuke M, Fisch M. Salvage strategies after complications of hypospadias repair. Urologe A 2007;46:1670-5.  Back to cited text no. 21
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Oseremen Inokhoife Aisuodionoe-Shadrach
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, Abuja
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0189-6725.150977

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  
 


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Patients and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5728    
    Printed65    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded170    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal